For more information on my writing, please visit my official author website!

Wednesday, December 08, 2004

An arrow to the sun....

Matthew Yglesias points out that the use of poisoned arrows is still against international law. Setting aside the issue of why present-day international law would be concerned with arrows -- surely we're not going to be refighting the Battle of Agincourt anytime soon -- I'm reminded of some disputes I used to have in college with my Dungeon Master when I was playing Advanced Dungeons and Dragons.

My DM insisted -- on what basis, I cannot recall -- that the use of poison, in any context whatsoever, is an inherently evil act and would therefore represent a de facto shift in alignment (the moral inclination of a player-character, for those unfamiliar with the game's terminology), with the requisite penalties in game play for an alignment change. I disagreed with this, positing a case wherein you're the local knight and your village is threatened by a magical dragon (as opposed to your everyday, non-magical dragons) which can only be killed via a certain poison. Is it an evil act to do so? My DM insisted that it was: if you are Good, you do not use poison. Ever.

I didn't agree, obviously, but I figured it wasn't a big enough deal to affect our gameplay.

My point? As ever, I don't have one. Heh!

No comments: