Thursday, September 18, 2003

IMAGE OF THE WEEK





The deployment of the Galileo space probe by the space shuttle Atlantis in 1989.

Galileo has spent almost eight years in the Jovian system, gathering immense amounts of information about the Solar System's largest planet and its moons. Now, with the ship's power nearly gone, NASA has put it into a course that will carry it down into the Jovian clouds this coming Sunday. For all the troubles NASA has had with Martian probes in recent years, it's worth remembering that a successful probe can yield astonishing results, vastly increasing our knowledge of our celestial neighborhood.

Godspeed, Galileo.



Hey, what a great crowd!

I just noticed this headline on AOL's news screen: "President Heads For the Hills".

(beat)

That's pretty much the story of this administration, isn't it?

(rimshot)

Thanks a lot folks, you've been great!

Chickens in the Mist, part the third.

(For an explanation of this particular bit of madness, read this post.)

:: KEVIN DRUM

MORE RECALL MADNESS….In a press conference yesterday, a reporter asked Arnold for his thoughts on why chickens cross roads so often in California. His answer? Because Gray Davis allows it. But of course, when it comes time for Arnold to provide an answer as to what he'll do to stop the tide of chickens crossing our roads, he simply says that he'll ask for a statewide audit of chicken-crossing procedures in California. And McClintock says that he'll authorize people to use their concealed handguns to shoot the chickens.

So, we have one candidate saying we'll audit the chickens, and another encouraging trigger-happy people to fill that California air with bullets in an effort to stop the chickens. And the one candidate who has the most realistic plan for stemming the tide of chickens is Gray Davis, and he's getting recalled! California politics are nuttier than our chickens, by far.

THANKS, RED STATES….A recent federal report suggests that chickens are constantly being enticed to cross the borders from us hard-working blue states to the chicken-starved red-states. So not only do the red-states hate us blue-states because we want the government to work harder at making sure everyone has a chicken, then they steal our chickens!

FRIDAY CAT BLOGGING….Isn't Inkblot (left) cute as she tears the heart out of that live chicken who dared to cross the road in front of our house? But Jasmine (right) prefers tuna. Go figure.

Making New Things look like Old Things.

The town in which I live, Orchard Park, has recently been expending a lot of effort to make its village center a lot more attractive. (Orchard Park is a fairly affluent suburb of Buffalo. It happens to be the town where Ralph Wilson Stadium is located, and thus, a lot of Buffalo Bills players end up living here.) They've built new sidewalks, planted flower beds and commissioned sculptures along the main streets, given pretty much every building a fresh coat of paint, and in one case even demolished a crappy 1960s era building that had been on the town's main streetcorner and replaced it with an attractive building of red brick that actually blends in with the older style buildings around it, including the 1910-era red brick building across the street. I don't know if they've read David Sucher's book City Comforts, but they seem to be putting a lot of his ideas into practice: building to the sidewalk, putting parking behind the buildings, putting a lot of benches about for people to sit, et cetera.

There have been a couple of mis-steps, though.

First, there are these really pretty new streetlights, the ones that look like old gaslights but aren't. Problem is, the bulbs they're using in these lights are those same horribly bright, amber/orange color you'll see in the streetlights along I-90 in Cleveland, for example, or on a thousand other big highways. The light from these is horribly garish, and doesn't enhance the town's attempts at the picturesque (which, during the day, are very effective indeed).

Second, it seems that the town might have gone wrong in its selection of contractors for certain aspects of the work. During the early summer, all of the crosswalks in the town center (basically those reflective strips on the pavement) were replaced with red-brick crosswalks that were really nice-looking when they were done. But as the summer wore on, the concrete or whatever is underneath those crosswalks turned out to be too soft, and many of those brand-spanking new brick crosswalks became somewhat buckled from all the automobile traffic crossing over them. So, guess what: today I drove through the town center, and observed men at work pulling up the "old" new crosswalks for replacement. Not six months after they were laid down.

I don't know if the original contractors did a bad job, or if they didn't figure on the wet summer we've had, or what. But it reminds me of that line in Armageddon when one of the guys says, just as they're about to lift off for space, something like: "Did it occur to you that we're all strapped into a machine built by the lowest bidder?"

(EDIT: Broken link rendered unbroken.)

Lack of faith? Disturbing!

His Swankness points to a joke that I really should have thought of myself. Ach, it makes me mad!

I'll Take "Requiem for Methuselah" for $500, Alex.

Lynn Sislo on band names. She opines that my "Lynn Sislo and the 2 Blowhards" sounds, to her, like a southern rock band. I was thinking a folk-rock type group, complete with penny-whistles and whatnot. And if you do nothing else today, at least take the "Christian Band or Star Trek Episode?" quiz. I got eight out of twelve, but one wasn't entirely fair because one of their Christian bands uses a phrase that is part of a Star Trek episode title.

Outplay. Outwit. Out damned spot!

Survivor starts its new season tonight. As with all previous incarnations of Survivor, I shall celebrate its return by watching Friends.

I'd probably be interested in Survivor if they did something like, oh, tell them they're taking them to some tropical island, so they pack accordingly…but really drop them off in the Northern Yukon. Or, give them parachutes and push them out of an airplane…over Kashmir. Yeah, that would be fun. Yee-haw!

10 cc's of Reality, Stat!

I've been paying attention to a discussion, involving several blogs and their comment threads, of the ongoing death-spasms of the recording industry, the feasibility of micropayments, and verious peripheral issues. Read here first, and then Daniel Davies's follow-up post (one of the commenters in that thread) here. In Davies's words:

"The issue of 'whither the music industry in a world of reduced intellectual property' is bound to bring out a lot of interesting opinions; I think this is because a) we don’t know what the heck will happen b) we’d all like to believe that the answer will involve us all owning loads and loads of fantastic music for next to no cost but c) we all suspect that it probably won’t."

I think that's exactly right. I've long since given up being enthusiastic about the soon-to-arrive dawn of the Incredibly Cheap Music Era, because it seems to me what most people are really trying to get at is some modified version of the "Information wants to be free" spiel, which I find utterly unconvincing to begin with. They say that death and taxes are the only two certainties in life, but I think there's a third: that given X that someone or some group wants, some other person will figure out a way to make money on it. There will never be a time when music is free, and the sooner we realize this, the better off we're all going to be.

That's Clark, nice!

I don't really have strong feelings yet, one way or the other, for General Wesley Clark in his run for the Democratic Presidential nomination, except to hope that maybe by virtue of Clark's candidacy, along with Senator John Kerry's Viet Nam vet-status, we might finally begin to cut away at this idiot idea out there that Democrats are basically peacenik McGovernites who loathe the military and whose discussions of foreign policy involve sitting around a campfire, smoking pot, and singing "Give Peace a Chance". I don't know anything about Clark yet, and I'll end up vocally supporting whoever ends up winning the nomination anyway.

However, I happened to be reading Eric Alterman's blog yesterday, and I found this quote, referring to the idea of a Dean-Clark ticket:

Don’t tell me it should be the other way around. [i.e., Dean-Clark as opposed to Clark-Dean.] Perhaps it should, but Clark’s advantages dissipate in the No. 2 spot. Nobody votes for a vice president except the immediate members of his family, and if I were Mary Cheney, I would have thought long and hard about even that.

Could someone explain to me how Clark's advantages (which I presume heavily involve his military status) "dissipate" if he is the Vice Presidential nominee? Wasn't George W. Bush's pick of Dick Cheney hailed as an illustration of Mr. Bush's intent to surround himself with good and experienced people who would help him overcome his lack of experience in foreign policy and military affairs? I don't understand what Alterman is getting at here, unless it's merely to suggest that Vice Presidential candidates do not, in themselves, make the difference between a winning Presidential nominee and a losing one. But that's a far cry from saying that Clark's advantages "dissipate".

Huh huh huh....huhhuhhuhhuh....

TBOGG gives a transcript of a "conversation" between Bill O'Reilly and Michael Savage. It reads rather like a transcript of a Beavis and Butthead episode, oddly enough.

(Oh, and Tom, bite me. At least my city isn't likely to end up floating in the middle of the Pacific Ocean after a big-ass earthquake someday!)

Wednesday, September 17, 2003

HERE SHE COMES!



According to our local weather reports, the Buffalo area will receive rains from Hurricane Isabel early Friday morning, to the tune of 3-5 inches of rain. Wow. It's kind of weird, looking out on a gorgeous sunny day right now and thinking that in less than 48 hours, we will be underneath a tropical depression.

This will be, to my knowledge, the most "direct" hit we've had from a hurricane since I've lived in this area. (Of course, it will no longer be a hurricane when it arrives here, but you get the idea.) The earliest experience I can remember with any hurricane was when I was in second grade. My family lived, at that time, in Elkins, West Virginia. It was Hurricane David that soaked us, although it had made landfall in Florida (if memory serves) and come all the way up the eastern seaboard, so by the time it got to us it was basically a big heap of rain.

Anyway, this is exciting and a bit scary at the same time. I'm sure, though, that if I lived in, say, Virginia along the Atlantic coast, I'd weight it a lot heavier on the "Scary" side of the scale. Best wishes to those who are living right in the line of fire.

Chickens in the Mist, part the second.

More chickens, more roads.

:: OLIVER WILLIS.

Yeah Baby! After the way that chicken ran across the road, there's no way Steve Spurrier's not going to sign him for the Skins! Way to go, Ballcoach! That chicken sure looks….Mmmmmm, Britney….

:: JAMES LILEKS.

Sometimes, living in the Twin Cities, a breeze will stir out of the west, a breeze that smells of North Dakota. You can tell the North Dakota breeze from the South Dakota breeze, because it's somehow more open, more trusting. A North Dakota breeze is one you'll trust. It's the one you feel at your back as you escort your chicken across the road.

At 11:00 this morning, a certain feeling of sadness descended upon Gnat and I, that sadness that comes of the Showcase on The Price is Right ending in a double overbid, so I put down my Mac keyboard and she put down her toys and we went to Target, because we needed handsoap. The liquid kind, in the cool dispenser that's slightly less cool than the one you'll find in IKEA, but that's OK because this one was designed by Americans, not Swedes. In Sweden, the chickens don't cross the road. That's because the Swedes don't have chickens.

It was a beautiful day, so I thought I should drive Gnat out to farm country. Nice thing about the midwest is you can go in any direction to get to farm country, but I decided to go west, because at least figuratively we'd be closer to the source of that North Dakota breeze, and maybe, if we stopped for a moment along the way and the air was just right and we inhaled at just the right time, we'd be able to smell Fargo. And it wouldn't be Fargo as it is now, but the Fargo of about six hours ago when the breeze came across it; and we'd take in the aroma of a Fargo whose time has come, and gone while we were watching Bob Barker.

So Gnat and I stood there a while, drawing in deep breaths.

"Is that Fargo, Daddy?" she'd say after each one. And I would have to say, "No, that's exhaust off I-94." Or, "No, the wind shifted just then. That's Mankato." Or a hundred other places. The truth is, I've forgotten the smell of Fargo. It happens, when you live in the Twin Cities. So finally I told Gnat "Yes, that was Fargo," even though it wasn't. Because it didn't smell like chickens.

And that's when, as if sent by some other force, the lone chicken came. And there, ten feet away from us, it crossed that lonely stretch of farm country road and disappeared into the brush on the other side.

A short while later, in the car, Gnat's tiny voice came to me from her rear-facing carseat (which we also bought at Target, because the Apple Store at the Mall of America doesn't sell carseats): "Daddy, why did that chicken cross the road?"

I have no real answer for her, so I give her the classic one, the one everyone knows. "To get to the other side, sweetie."

And I don't tell her that the coyotes are especially bad this year. Gnat is too young for nightmares about coyotes.

Embrace the Randomness!

Time for some lazy and random acts of linkage.

:: The Lord of All Things Swank points out a collection of 404 pages…including one that appears to be the actual classic text-adventure game, Zork. Oh, the hours I used to lose playing Zork…and its even greater forerunner, Colossal Cave…those were the days!

:: Via Alexandra I find the greatest Flash timewaster ever.

:: Via Lynn Sislo I find the worst jobs in science. Ewwwwww. I hope none of these jobs exist in Buffalo.

:: Scott points out a way that one can show one's disdain for people who think they need to drive a Hummer. I don't know…I sympathize, but I'm not sure that offending someone who is driving a vehicle that probably wouldn't lurch more than one might expect from a low speed-bump as it ran me over is such a good idea.

SDB weighs in today on why Anna Kournikova is such a marketing hit, whereas a number of superior tennis players - - the Williams sisters, primarily - - are not. This is one of his best recent posts, and I think he's pretty much nailed it: In an era where sex appeal seems to be the driving force behind most successful advertising campaigns, it's simply to be expected that blond-hair-and-blue-eyes is valued above black-and-muscular-and-more-talented. It's a tad depressing, but there it is. (I also think there's something of the "Russian Princess" factor here that makes her a bit more exotic. If she was from Schenectady and her name was Jolene Johnson, to make up a middle-American name off the top of my head, I suspect she would have to really ratchet up the sex factor to achieve equal success.)

SDB also spends a bit of time discussing the physical attributes desirable in various sports, and I think he's pretty much got it on a lot of those, especially in his discussion of baseball not really favoring any particular physical advantage. Sure, we had Mark McGuire, who was powerfully muscled, but Barry Bonds - - while certainly very fit - - is not nearly as muscular, and yet he's the player of this generation, as well as probably one of the five best of all time, in my opinion. You have big, hulking players in baseball and you have little wiry guys in baseball. And with pitchers, there's an equal disparity: Randy Johnson is something like six-foot-six, and looks like he weighs all of 150 pounds. In fact, one of my favorite baseball moments ever came in an All-Star Game in either 1993 or 1994, when the tall-and-lanky Johnson pitched to the short-and-stocky John Kruk (who proceeded to purposely strike out, so terrified was he when Johnson uncorked a 98-mph fastball over his head).

I do take issue, a bit, with something SDB says at the very end: "I am rather using her as a symbol of what I see as a basic corruption in women's sports in general." I'm really not sure why what he has said here pertains only to women's sports, as opposed to sports in general. Sports marketing is all over the map, really. Definitely, in terms of women, it's the sex appeal that drives the marketing, but I'm not sure that reflects on the sports themselves.

I'm also not sure I agree that women's figure skaters really project an air of "virginity". The coin-of-the-realm there is more elegance, which isn't quite the same thing. As to when the last time a married woman won a major skating event, well - - skating has been trending toward younger competitors winning in most recent years, which is in turn something of a consequence of the increased focus on jumping in the sport. Most of the competitors who can turn in long program with six or seven triple jumps are teenagers, because all that jumping takes a toll (women's bodies aren't as well-suited to doing jump-centric skating as men's bodies are), thus forcing the women into the professional ranks sooner, where jumping isn't so important. (You won't see Kristi Yamaguchi, who won gold in the 1992 Olympics, doing a performance with a lot of triples these days.) And given that these skaters are so young, it's not really a surprise that they're unmarried.

If figure-skating suggests an air of chastity on the part of its female athletes, I think that's more a result of the sport becoming youth-skewed than an intended result of its own (and I'm far from convinced that there even is an air of chastity at all). And even then, it only really applies to the solo women skaters. In the pairs and dance competitions, you'll often find sex appeal all over the place. Torvil and Dean, for example, had so much sexual chemistry that people ever since have assumed they were married, but they weren't; and the Russian pairs often exude eroticism galore.

(And as far as tennis goes, I always thought Steffi Graf was gorgeous. But that's just me.)

Frankly, my dear....

I watched about a third of Gone With the Wind last night. I hadn't seen the movie in quite a long time, and I checked the DVD out of the library. My impressions of the film remain pretty much the same as when I first sat through the whole thing, about seven or eight years ago: I find the whole depiction of the slavery-era South as a land of undying chivalry really cloying, and offhand I can't think of a single character in this movie who is not in need of a big dope-slap. That includes Rhett Butler, who seems to inexplicably fixate on Scarlett O'Hara the second he catches his first glimpse of her. Clark Gable's performance is wonderful, of course, but his character alternates between being a cynical realist (telling all those Southern gentlemen that when war comes, they're likely to get their asses kicked) and being a boob ("You're still thinking about Ashley?", a line that is repeated way too many times).

The Max Steiner score is wonderful as always, though, and the film is still an impressive production after all these years - - in the parts where nobody is talking.

Raining on Parades

According to John Scalzi, my wistful dreams of blogging-for-dollars or, failing that, having my blogging lead to paid writing will remain just that, wistful dreams.

Alas…but he's probably right, in the strict "career" sense. I do think that blogging keeps the writing-muscle sharp, but that's about it, in terms of being lucrative. But then, nobody ever really knows what the future holds.

So I'll keep dreaming.

Tuesday, September 16, 2003

A Mind, Boggled.

Hold in your mind, if you will, the single dumbest thing you have ever heard any celebrity say. OK?

Now, check this out.

Did that knock the one you already had off the top rung? It sure did with me.

Chickens in the Mist, first installment.

A few days ago, Sheila had a funny post mocking how SF writers would answer the age-old question, Why did the chicken cross the road? She also solicits people to try some other authors in her comments.

I, however, will attempt something different: doing it with other bloggers. Therefore, the first two entries in yet another sporadic series which will be eventually fall by the wayside three posts after it stops being funny:

:: GLENN REYNOLDS.

THE CHICKEN, REVISITED: Via Blogger#1, we have the goods on the chicken and the road.

Because it had orders to do so from Saddam and al Qaeda.



Indeed.

UPDATE: Blogger#2 says that it's more likely that the chicken merely wanted to cross the road. Maybe. But who can read the mind of a chicken? I'll stick with the first answer.

ANOTHER UPDATE: Blogger#3 has more on the chicken. Blogger#4 has a lot to say about chickens. And read Mickey Kaus on the road-crossing habits of French chickens. Heh.

:: ATRIOS.

Blame the CLENIS

The WaPo reports that the chicken coop escaped harm when the suicide-bomber chicken only got halfway across the road before the bomb went off. And who is Howie Kurtz blaming for the recent spate of suicidal chickens crossing roads? Bill Clinton. That damn SCLM!

---

Torture Wolf Blitzer

Wolfie's asking who's to blame for the chicken! GO!

Well, it's better than botherin' people!

In the movie Sleepless in Seattle there is a running joke about a false statistic that a woman is more likely to be killed by a terrorist than get married after the age of 40. At one point, someone says, "That statistic is totally not true. But it feels true."

Something else that feels true, but isn't, is the bit about spousal abuse being higher on Super Bowl Sunday than on any other day of the year. It's not true, but it feels true to me, especially when I listen to AM sports radio stations after a Bills game.

Case in point: as I noted in my review of Sunday's win over the Jags, I didn't see the whole game, opting instead to go to a movie. So when I came out of the theater, I turned on the radio to check the final score (a Jacksonville comeback would have been staggering, considering they were down 31-10 when we went into the theater). The host was railing on and on about how bad a certain decision by Gregg Williams was, and how could we possibly think the Bills are a Super Bowl contender when the head coach is making decisions like that, and this might be the kind of thing that sinks his career in Buffalo (Williams is, as of now, unsigned beyond this year as head coach of the Bills). Hearing this, I'm thinking, "Jeez, did they let the Jags back in at the end? or worse, did they surrender the big lead and actually lose?"

Well, no. The Bills never trailed in the game. Their smallest lead was seven points, twice, in the first half. Their final margin of victory was twenty-one points. It was a commanding effort, and yet, the folks on the radio were furious about a single play (a gonzo faked punt that failed miserably, in the second quarter, when the Bills were up 14-0). And this, mind you, was two and a half hours after the game had ended.

Maybe more guys don't beat their wives after their team loses the Super Bowl. But damn, sometimes I can see why we might think they do.

If this annoys you, press one.

Sean points out a Dave Barry-inspired turnabout on the telemarketers. I found this hilarious. I've written before that generally I don't hold with being mean to the actual telemarketer making the call, for various reasons (I simply have stopped answering the phone, which isn't that big a sacrifice for me since I've never liked talking on the phone). But this prank actually posed a significant inconvenience to the actual Telemarketing Association, which is great. Mr. Barry said, "They have phones like the rest of us have phones. Their attitude seems to be if you have a phone, people are allowed to call you."

It's always fun when people realize that the blade they've been using to cut someone else actually has two edges and cuts both ways, isn't it?

Boo-hoo-hoo....

It's official: Corrente's hit-count has passed mine, and they only needed about a month to do it. To paraphrase the great Mr. Williams, there are tears in my beer.

False Witness, and its Bearing-in-progress.

Every so often I'll encounter a David Horowitz article, in the course of doing Web-stuff, and just about every time I am reminded of what an intellectually-dishonest nut he is. A case-in-point is this attack on Al Franken's book, Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them, which Horowitz wrote. I found it on Busy, Busy, Busy, where it was helpfully shortened. For no real reason - - I was waiting five minutes for dinner to finish baking - - I read the actual article. And sure enough, Horowitz is still a nut.

First, there's the opening graf. Now, I'm only halfway through Franken's book, so I may very well be wrong here. But I find it vanishingly hard to believe that Franken thinks, or even suggests, that "All Republicans are racists". At one point, for example, Franken writes admiringly of John McCain, who last time I checked is Republican, and not racist. (I admire McCain a great deal myself, even if I disagree with him on a great number of issues.) And the simple fact is that President Clinton engaged in a good deal of anti-terrorist activity, much of it specifically directed at Osama Bin Laden. Horowitz, of course, is one of those right-wingers who can't entertain the idea that Darth Clinton accomplished anything at all outside of evading Jedi Master Gingrich, so his discounting of the Clinton anti-terrorism efforts is to be expected.

Horowitz further acts as if the book's level of factual detail is suspicious:

"Where did a comedian like Al Franken get the time, research power and expertise to cover such a wide range of subject matters, almost all of which are out of his normal depth?"

Leaving aside the obvious question as to how qualified Horowitz is to assess Franken's "normal depth" (Franken seems to me a very intelligent comedian, much like Dennis Miller, whom I still find enjoyable even though he's gone over to "the Dark Side"), Horowitz is behaving as if it's somehow scandalous that Franken had a research team helping him in the factual analysis. He's shocked! shocked! that Harvard would sanction such a thing, and he thinks that this is an "educational national disgrace" that Harvard allowed its students to be used in such a manner.

Except, when you look at the section at the book's end where Franken not only names his students but provides their pictures and brief biographical sketches of them, you find this little tidbit:

The fourteen members of TeamFranken [that's what Franken calls his assistants throughout the book] received no course credit for their work. While carrying full course loads at either the Kennedy School or the College, they did their research out of dedication to the truth and for a home-cooked meal provided by my wife Franni every Wednesday night at the Cambridge apartment we rented. [Emphasis added.]

So, to Horowitz, it is an "educational national disgrace" that Harvard allowed fourteen students to do research for Mr. Franken, on their own time, and for no course credit. They didn't give Franken his assistants; they did not assign these students to do this. They did it voluntarily, at the behest of Mr. Franken. All Harvard did is say, "OK, fine", kind of like the University would theoretically do if some students wanted to start up a birdwatching club. If this is Horowitz's idea of an educational disgrace, then I can only imagine how he might feel about the Advanced Dungeons and Dragons group in which I participated on my own time in college, and for which I received no course credit.

Horowitz's next graf is even worse:

Although liberals like Franken regularly complain about the unfair advantage "big right-wing think tanks" provide to the Republican cause, Harvard and in fact the entire Ivy League constitute infinitely larger left-wing think tanks that serve the Democratic cause. (For comparison, Harvard's endowment, according to the latest figures, is $17.5 billion; the Heritage Foundation's is $63 million.)

Sure, Mr. Horowitz. Those two figures you throw out there, at the very end, are really comparable. I'm sure that Mr. Franken, and liberals like him, have the entirety of Harvard's $17.5 billion endowment behind them. I'm sure that none of that money goes to Harvard's physics department or computer science department or athletic program. A better comparison might be the Kennedy School of Government's budget, but even then, you have to differentiate between any activities the Kennedy School engages in that are of similar function to the Heritage Foundation's. Horowitz simply tosses out a couple of numbers, one of which is way bigger than the other, and hopes his readers will assume they're the same thing. Funny how precisely that particular method of lying is demonstrated quite a few times in Franken's book, eh?

And as for the whole bit about slagging the Ivy League, well - - why do conservatives bash the Ivy League incessantly, except for when they rise to the Ivy League's defense when some liberal questions President Bush's intellectual acumen? "How can he be stupid? He went to Yale and got his MBA at Harvard!" Yes, he did - - and he managed to spend all those years hip-deep in all them libruls and managed to become the most conservative US President since Coolidge. That either means that the Ivy League isn't quite the liberal incubation scheme that Horowitz and his cohorts like to say it is, or it means that the Ivy League actually is a liberal incubation scheme and merely isn't very good at it, in which case Horowitz and his cohorts should stop acting like the Ivy League threatens the entire fabric of, well, everything.

Of course, the last few grafs are basically where Horowitz pimps out some study performed by his own cohorts that proves liberal bias in academia. My general reaction to that is, basically, to yawn. Maybe he's right, maybe he isn't. He doesn't provide any links to the study, and I don't much care anyway. My own collegiate experience, anecdotal as it is, was that even the most liberal professors there had little effect on the views of my conservative classmates. Even if academia is overwhelmingly liberal, which I am by no means prepared to grant, I'm not at all convinced that this is in any way pernicious.

So, I'm content to let David Horowitz vanish back into whatever weird ethereal realm he usually inhabits. Better luck next time, Mr. Horowitz.

(Actually, I can't let this one sentence in the article go without comment:

Ann Coulter has written a parallel bestseller (under her own steam, however) that attacks liberals and Democrats like Al Franken. Can anyone imagine Harvard soliciting Coulter to write her book, "Treason," by providing her with 14 graduate students to research it?

Frankly, no, I can't imagine Harvard giving Coulter 14 graduate assistants to research her book. But maybe next time Coulter should ask for some Harvard students, if only to give her insane blatherings a small bit of veracity.)

What, AGAIN?!

Despite all my years of watching public TV, I still never manage to make the logical connection from "Hey, this is a great program! They don't usually show stuff like this! I'm sittin' down to watch this puppy!" to "Oh crap, it's pledge time." I also wish I had money to give them, alas....

Uh-oh....

Goodness. This certainly is something that demands attention.

Captain, let the 12-year old have a try.

For some reason, even though I've read WWDN ever since I launched Byzantium's Shores, I don't often point out anything specific over there, despite the fact that it's almost always either funny or moving, and often both. Wil Wheaton is a fine writer, and I am one who never hated him on Star Trek.

Anyway, he was personally moved by John Ritter's death, and his special Flash-tribute for 9-11-01 from last Thursday, viewable here with background on it here, was simple and lovely.

Monday, September 15, 2003

In the Second Week, the camp was beset by Jaguars....

The Bills beat Jacksonville, 38-17, in Jacksonville. Yay!

I didn't watch the whole game, because an opportunity to go out with the wife, and without the kid, presented itself. (We left her in the car while we saw a movie.) (No, not really. But we did go to a movie.) But I did get to see the game get to 31-10, so I was happy.

The Bills are looking like they might just be for real this year. Those who were along for my NFL ride last year, and who actually read those posts instead of ignoring them as sports-babbling, remember that I tend to err on the side of pessimism where the Bills are concerned, on the theory that pessimists are prepared when the worst happens and presently surprised when it doesn't. Thus, I predicted 6-10 for the Bills in 2002; they turned in an 8-8 record, which made me presently surprised.

So, I'm not just some goofy homer jumping on a bandwagon. The Bills played a tough team today (the Jags aren't an elite team, but they're most definitely not the Bengals either) that is coming off a painful loss last week, on the road, in weather conditions they're not used to (high heat and humidity). And they commanded the game. I was very pleasantly surprised by the way their offensive line controlled the line of scrimmage today, a fact which augurs well for later in the season and especially next week, because I'm not totally convinced that Miami's defense is the next incarnation of last year's Bucs or the 2000 Ravens. The lack of yardage produced by the running game is a bit of a concern, but the development of pass protection is a very welcome development.

The defense played pretty well - - they were very physical, but they also looked a bit more susceptible to overpursuit of the run than I had expected. That needs some work. And I'd still like more pass-rush! Oh, and don't ask me about that fake punt. I have no idea what that was about. Gregg Williams occasionally seems to lose his senses completely, and that was one of them.

All in all, a good game. The Bills are 2-0, still in sole possession of first place in the AFC East, going into their first game against Miami next week. Bring on the Dolphins.

Other notes:

:: The defending champion Bucs are 1-1 after losing in overtime to Carolina. The Bucs really need to find some offense, but they probably don't need a whole lot of offense to stay on track to win a second championship. In the middle of the 2000 season, a lot of people had a good time making fun of the Ravens, who went something like four consecutive games without scoring a touchdown. That Ravens team ended up winning that year's Super Bowl behind a defense that was probably as good as the 1985 Bears' D.

:: The Eagles are in a world of hurt right now. In the little I've watched them, they looked terrible.

:: Is the starting job in St. Louis now Marc Bulger's for good? Or just until Mike Martz blunders up his career too, by refusing to use his running game and refusing to address an injury to the guy? Stay tuned…I happen to not think that Kurt Warner's career is over, although it may well be, as far as the Rams are concerned. He might not have a 5000-yard, 50-touchdown pass season again, but I think he'll end up somewhere else and, if the system is right, end up being productive if not a winner again.

That's all for this week. I always find it hard to focus on football in the early weeks of the season, when it's still too warm to sit inside for an entire Sunday afternoon. But we're only two short weeks from October, my favorite month as well as the best sports month of the year!

Finally, a movie that doesn't make Mr. Flynn spin in his grave

The wife and I went to see Pirates of the Caribbean yesterday, and we had probably the best time at the movies that we've had in a long time. Sure, we've seen better or greater movies, but this one was more plain fun than anything. I found it crafty, witty, and basically a rollicking-good time. Of course, I'm predisposed to liking pirate movies in general - - I enjoyed Cutthroat Island, for corn's sakes - - but this thing just delighted me, to no end.

I love watching scenery-chewing actors, bellowing orders for their scurvy-dog crewmen to unleash the halyards or whatever. I love the backstabbing treachery that's a part of every great pirate movie. I love the secret treasure hordes, the damsels who in pirate movies always seem to be more than mere shrieking damsels. All of it's good. I read some reviews that say that Pirates of the Caribbean is too long, but I did not find it too long at all. Johnny Depp played the most interesting pirate I've seen in some time, Orlando Bloom shows that he has a future ahead of him once Legolas is done with, et cetera.

I did think that the film pushed the fight scenes between the living warriors and the undead ones a bit far. I wanted to know what would happen to those three undead whom Orlando Bloom blows to bits at the end, what would happen if one got beheaded, et cetera. The idea is clearly that eventually the undead would win by sheer attrition, but it felt like it should have happened sooner, with the "good guys" not really doing much damage to slow them down. But that's a quibble. The supernatural element was a pretty nifty twist on the whole pirate story.

Klaus Badelt's music score was just OK - - it did the job, but it wasn't particularly memorable. It certainly did not make me come close to forgetting Erich Wolfgang Korngold's scores to The Sea Hawk or Captain Blood, and I was distressed that he borrowed from James Horner's bag-of-tricks, of all people (the suspense music with the shakuhachi flute ostinato).

I don't know if the pirate movie can ever really make a full-fledged comeback, but it would be nice to see a good one more than just every ten years or so.

Before the movie, we saw a preview for the next Disney movie based on a ride, The Haunted Mansion. That might be fun. I've always liked Eddie Murphy and dearly wish he hadn't spent so much time making bad movies. Oh, and we walked into the theater in the midst of a preview for some new movie starring Rob Lowe as a Washington, DC lawyer…only it wasn't a preview for a movie. It was an ad for that Lyons' Den TV show that's starting up on NBC soon. Now I gotta watch ads for TV shows at the movies?

Elementary, Watson! (and please pass the opium.)

Thanks to the efforts of a friend, I got to see The Private Life of Sherlock Holmes recently. I enjoyed this movie a good deal, although I enjoyed it more for the "Private Life" stuff than for the film's actual mystery story. The film's first half-hour or so is delightful, and the two actors playing Holmes and Watson are excellent, with good chemistry. The score gave me some pause, though: it is by Miklos Rozsa, and is wonderful music in itself (based, in large part, on Rozsa's own Violin Concerto). But I found the music's Hungarian character a bit at odds with the film's British settings. (Rozsa himself makes a cameo in the film, as - - what else? - - an orchestra conductor.)

A Patch of Green, where None Should Be.

I don't mean to keep beating 9-11-01 into the ground, but John Hardy, one of my fellows over at Collaboratory, posted another aerial (or space-based) photograph of the post-attack WTC site. What struck me about this photo is that, even though it was clearly taken within weeks of the attacks, there is a small park visible about four blocks away from the site that is still green.

Things AOL Taught Me, #4389

If you take a photograph of Johnny Cash from his later years when his hair was gray, and you shrink it down to thumbnail size, he looks a lot like George Washington.

Blogging: Better than Moldering Cheese

For years, my main hangout spots on the Net were Usenet newsgroups, which I have just about left behind completely. Blogistan, I am finding, is a much more convivial place, for a lot of reasons.

The biggest reason is that Usenet groups are divided by category and subject, whereas blogs are not. On Usenet, this is a device of convenience: if you want to discuss, say, science fiction books, you find the newsgroup specifically devoted to them, and there you will find (theoretically) lots of people of similar interest. But problems then crop up: some active newsgroup participants tend to be militant about remaining "on topic" (i.e., "This is rec.art.sf.written. Don't mention movies here."), where others are more forgiving. One person on rec.arts.books (a group which I have not read in over two years now) once described this conundrum this way: "Some people view rec.arts.books as a place to discuss books and nothing else; others view it as a place for bookish people to discuss anything they like." But with blogs, the only topical constraints are self-imposed by the person writing the blog.

And that leads me to what makes Blogistan a more friendly place, even if there are occasional outbreaks of scandal and whatnot. With the pressure of topicality removed, or placed into the purview of the blogger him- or herself, it's a lot easier to get a handle on a blogger's personality than it is on Usenet. On newsgroups, I often observed (and occasionally fell victim to) instances of posters forming allegiances with one another on one contentious topic, only to discover later on that they disagreed vehemently on another topic. And almost always, whenever this happened, the earlier civility was completely forgotten as the new enmities took over. The short version of this is that respect, in Blogistan, seems to be more robust than on Usenet.

This is just my experience, of course, and as always, nothing I say in this post should be interpreted as having any larger point than simply reporting my own experience. Except, of course, for when I am completely correct in every way. Or something like that.

The Ever-expanding Blogroll

The emergence of an "Artist's Quarter" in Blogistan is an encouraging development. A pretty good one, fairly new, that I've been following for a few weeks now is Ionarts, which has a nifty design, to boot. Check it out. Particularly notable is the ongoing reading project there, comprising nearly every significant work of literature to ever be set in, or around, Paris.

(I'd credit where I first saw Ionarts listed, but I can't remember if it was Lynn Sislo or the Blowhards, so I'll just mention both. And now it suddenly occurs to me that I'd pay to hear a rock band called "Lynn Sislo and the Blowhards".)

Sunday, September 14, 2003

Moto perpetuo



In today's bit of link-pilfering (this time from John Scalzi, a.k.a. Mr. "One Blog Just Ain't Enough!") we have The Museum of Unworkable Devices, devoted to perpetual motion, which as John notes is impossible by the laws of physics but not at all impossible by the laws of four-year-olds.

St. Crispin's Day

Alexandra points out a quite wonderful 9-11-01 remembrance that happens to feature my favorite bit from Shakespeare.

More on 9-11-01

A lot of bloggers are pointing to this list of Twenty Unanswered Questions About 9-11-01, so I might as well join the crowd. I'd like to know the answers to a lot of these, myself.

I find #7 a bit troubling, though. Try as I might to get mad at President Bush about this, I really can't do it. I have wondered why the Secret Service did not immediately intercede and insist on moving the President to a secure location, but that probably falls into the realm of military response and that kind of thing of which I have little knowledge. My suspicion is that, in times like that, a President will generally defer to the people around him - - his security people, his generals, et cetera. If their word was "We don't know what the hell's going on yet", it seems clear to me that they'd keep him there.

The article asks, "Why didn't he take more decisive action?" I'm really not sure at all what action he could have taken in those moments. As for sitting there reading with the children, well - - the placement looks bad by virtue of contrast between where he was, at that moment, and what was happening in Lower Manhattan (and soon to unfold at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania). Mr. Bush's position was probably "Until we know what's going on and what we're doing, let's not scare these kids unnecessarily." And I really can't fault him for that.

Ultimately, this list of questions makes me realize that although we think we know exactly what happened on that day, because we were alive and we watched it on TV and in some cases we were there, we really don't know. I commented on Thursday that we are going to see 9-11-01 become, unavoidably, less "our day of infamy" and more an object of historical study, and this list of questions points the way. Twenty, thirty, forty years from now -- and longer than that, really -- people will write about 9-11-01, and they will ask questions about it. Government documents will be examined. Histories will be written. Multiple theories as to what occurred, and why, will arise, and some of them will be in conflict. Those of us who lived through that day will likely have a hard time reconciling those histories with our memories, but that's the way it will be. It always is.

Would you like that Eastwood with Guilt, or without?

Greg Harris lists a few guilty pleasures. I often have trouble with listing guilty pleasures, because I view the definition of "guilty pleasure" as "something you like, when you know you shouldn't". My problem is that, even when I like something most people hate, I rarely view it as a guilty pleasure and more as a case of me seeing something in it that no one else does. In other words, I'm right and they're wrong. Like with the Star Wars prequels. They're good movies, and if you don't like them, then you're a pinhead. So there.

But I suppose I can come up with a few that fill the bill. Most are movies.

Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves. Yeah, Costner's accent is nonexistent; but the movie's grasp of history is so unbelievably bad that even now I can't believe that Costner's accent is the most often-cited problem with this movie. I don't know, maybe it's Alan Rickman spitting out lines like "No more merciful beheadings, and call off Christmas!". But I can't dislike the movie.

Independence Day. This movie's opening act is one of the best ever, even if the science is absolutely laughable (do you have any idea how much energy it would take to slow down an object that is one-fourth the size of the Moon>). And there are other staggering plot holes in the movie: "Wow, Will Smith is such a good pilot that he managed to spot a top-secret government facility that no one's known about for fifty years from the air, all while being chased by an alien spaceship!" "Wow, somehow the government managed to keep that facility secret for fifty years despite the fact that it's visible enough for Will Smith to spot while executing evasive maneuvers overhead!" Poor Mary McDonnell has what might be the most pointless death scene in all of cinema, and I wonder if a sequel would have a scene in which Jeff Goldblum, learning that the aliens are coming back, says, "Don't worry. I beat 'em with a 1995 Powerbook last time, and now I've got a 2003 Powerbook. They're toast." But crap, the movie's got such a sense of over-the-top goofy fun that I can't hate it.

Every Which Way But Loose and Any Which Way You Can. I'm stretching, here, because I honestly love these two movies. Clint Eastwood, Geoffrey Lewis (an underused actor if ever there was one), bareknuckle fighting, an inept motorcycle gang, barroom brawls, country music from before the "Rockabilly" types took over, and an orangutan named Clyde. What's not to love? (Well, I could do without the old guy in the second movie who actually has a sexual fantasy about Ruth Gordon.)

Flash Gordon. Another movie that plants its feet firmly on the dividing line between "Whiz bang fun!" and "Friggin' laughable!", and stays there for the whole running time.

And finally, for the record, Buffalo-style chicken wings are not a guilty pleasure. Yes, I love them. Yes, they're incredibly bad for you. No, I do not feel the slightest bit of guilt when I eat them, although that's rare these days.

(It occurs to me that the contents of this post may be repeating a post or two I have written in the past. Oh well.)

Man...that Admiral guy...he's a dish!

Via Tacitus I find what must surely be the oddest Star Wars fan site ever.

I've often wondered if Piett was angry about his career track: he gets command of the Imperial Fleet when Ozzel screws up royally, he seems to do pretty well in the job, and when the time finally comes for the big final battle with those pesky Rebels, he's ordered to just stand there and keep them from escaping!

EMPEROR: Keep them from escaping.

PIETT: Can I blow up one of those little blockade runners? Can I just do that?

EMPEROR: No.

A Small Amouth of Faith in the Next Generation, Reaffirmed.

Congratulations to dad-to-be David Letterman, who after all these years is still my favorite late-night TV host. (Well, of the post-Johnny Carson era, that is.) It will be interesting to see how his new fatherhood plays out in all the Top Ten lists to come.

(BTW, in case anyone watched Letterman on Friday night and thought it strange that he made no mention of the passings of Johnny Cash and John Ritter, the reason for this is that Letterman doesn't do any tapings on Fridays. He tapes two shows on Thursday, the second of which is aired Friday night. Thus, the two men hadn't died at the time of the Friday show's taping. I haven't seen anyone complaining about it, but it might strike some people as odd that two show-biz deaths on Friday went unmentioned by Dave. That's why.)

When life throws you a curve....

Mike, of the Baseball Rants, has fathered a child, and is to be congratulated. I think it would be funny if it turned out that his new kid looked like Joe Morgan....

Start your list now, Oliver!

I'd love to help Oliver Willis out, but not at the expense of rooting for the Redskins. Sorry.

Priorities? What's That?

Kevin Drum points out a depressing article about parents and their cellphones, and then he writes about the pressures of "proper" schooling (as in, getting kids into the right schools and first-graders spending four hours each night doing homework and the like). Both of these articles put me in mind of George Carlin.

In the cellphone article, in which parents clearly think their phone conversations are of greater importance than their kids, I recall Carlin saying, "It's a baby. Touch the little prick once in a while; he'll thank you for it someday." That's exactly right. I'm as guilty as any parent, really, of not always being attentive to what my kid's up to. It's really hard not to be. It's really hard not to simply say "That's nice", without turning my head, when she wants to show me that her kitty is sitting on her lap for the thousandth day in a row. But that doesn't make it right. There is a fundamental difference between occasionally having to say, "Sweetie, I'm doing something important right now, so can you play by yourself for a while?" and treating your child as a feature in the wallpaper of one's life.

And in the second case, a recent Carlin album has a lengthy segment on how out-of-whack our society's fixation on children has become. He says, "You have a child fetish, you've turned them into little cult objects, and it's not healthy." This goes hand-in-hand with the cellphone article, because we're in increasing danger of not seeing children as people but as things to be paraded about so that our peers can see how wonderful we are. Children have become one more way of "Keeping up with the Joneses", and it's really depressing. I resent being made to feel that if my daughter isn't quite reading yet (much less at a fourth grade level or whatever), or if she's only starting preschool yet (actually, she is), or if she's not already taking violin or dance lessons, that I'm somehow crippling her future. I resent it because (a) it's completely false (late-bloomers and early-flameouts are a dime-a-dozen), and (b) it's none of anyone's damn business but ours, anyway.

An Ellis Moment

Move any beverages away from your computer before reading Warren Ellis's take on Enterprise, particularly a bit about halfway through when Ellis draws a contrast between Captain Kirk and Captain Archer. Of course, Ellis disses Star Wars in his last sentence, and for that he must be eliminated. All in good time, my pretties....

Friday, September 12, 2003

Outfits Not Seen Enough in Buffalo, #477

The Kimono.



Back in my day....

So, when did the distance between kids' houses requiring the school bus to make two stops instead of one shrink to about fifty-six feet, anyway? I actually managed to pass the bus, on foot, because it made three stops in less than one-tenth of a mile. Yeesh.

HE went to Harvard?!

Via TBOGG, I find Conan O'Brien's commencement speech to Harvard from a few year's back. This is one of the funniest things I've read in quite some time.

For $45, this had better be the best beer ever!

Matthew Yglesias is sure lucky that he's writing good articles for The American Prospect, like this one on media bias in 9-11-03 coverage, seeing as how his new subserviance to new Lords and Masters requires him to not write as many blog entries these days.

It is pretty weird, though, that Matthew gets to write posts for Tapped, the Prospect's weblog, but anonymously since Tapped doesn't attribute its authors on the group blog. I wonder what their rationale for that is?

...Went down, down, down, but the flames rolled higher...





I suspect we all have musicians and recording artists of whom we periodically think, "Why do I only own one CD of theirs?" Johnny Cash was one of mine. My favorite songs of his were "Ring of Fire", "Tennessee Flat Top Box", and "The Long Gray Veil". But I've heard so very few of his songs.

A few years ago, I toured the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in Cleveland (with this guy and his uncommonly-tolerant wife) and saw some of Cash's artifacts on display there. Until that time I had pretty much thought of Cash as only a country music artist, when in fact he was much more than that.

(Aaron also laments Cash's passing today, and provides some links.)

Wake up, Stanley...I think Jack just got home....

I often check AICN in the morning, just to see if there's any breaking news about movies or whatever that I can't live without. This morning, the first thing I see is this: "AICN remembers John Ritter". And I'm thinking, "What the hell? Wasn't John Ritter on TV, like, two nights ago?"

Yes, yes he was. And no, he won't be any more. Damn.

(BTW, am I the only one who remembers his movie Hero At Large, in which Ritter plays an actor who gets overly attached to his role as a caped superhero?)

Uh-oh....

A terrifying thought just occurred to me: If the rule that "Things happen in threes" applies, and with John Ritter and Johnny Cash both dying yesterday…and with the score to Star Wars Episode III as yet uncomposed…somebody better check on this guy, and make sure he's healthy. Get him a check-up, raid his kitchen for foods too high in fat, you know the drill!

Two and two are five.

It's an amazing thing when a person can perpetuate an old lie and start a new one, and in a sentence of only 28 words, to boot. Ann Coulter hits the bigtime.

He said his name was "Adlai"....

I don't normally bother with Internet personality quizzes, but the Are You a Neocon? quiz, linked by The Modulator (which sounds like a supervillain the X-Men might face), was a pretty interesting one, with actual nuanced questions. One problem I had is that, on at least three of the questions, there were two answers that I could honestly say represented my views, and there's one question that doesn't have any answers that I felt truly represented my views. Anyhow, I'm sure it will come as little surprise that the quiz pegged me as a Liberal (the other possibilities being an Isolationist, a Realist, or a Neoconservative). What interests me is that in most of the questions I specifically did not choose the responses that seemed most clearly "liberal" to me - - i.e., the "We're a bunch of imperialistic bullies and it's no wonder they hate us" responses. And still, the quiz marked me as "Liberal".

Gregory Harris also took the quiz, and somehow he got scored a "Realist". Must be the three martinis he had for lunch. (I wonder if he's getting tired about my martini jokes lately?)

No Donut?

The Breakfast of Champions, according to Warren Ellis. Explains a lot....

Rock, Paper, .35-Caliber Bullets

From News of the Weird I note this fascinating item:

Three teenagers with paintball guns terrorized kids on a playground until they fired into the wrong group of kids, one of whom returned fire with a real gun, wounding two paintballers (Pittsburgh).

It looks like the old grade-school admonishment, "It's all fun and games until someone loses an eye", should now be changed to "It's all fun and games until someone gets shot."

Also via the same site, any of my readers who sire male children in the future might want to avoid a certain middle name. I've never put much stock in the idea that a person's name steers the course of their life or determines their eventual personality, but this is just scary.

Thursday, September 11, 2003

IMAGE OF THE WEEK




The World Trade Center, 6-1-00; The World Trade Center, 9-15-01.
The Pentagon, 9-7-01; The Pentagon, 9-12-01.

These Space Imaging photos, actually taken from space, are part of two series of photographic chronologies of the attacks and the cleanup efforts. I wasn't sure if I wanted to post any images directly related to the attacks today, but this is a perspective I had not seen before and I thought it bore sharing.

Apologue

A few months after I wrote "The City of Dead Works", I chanced upon a story by James Morrow called "Apologue". This is the 9-11-01 story that I wish I had thought to write. Read it here. It's very short, and deeply moving - - a sublime illustration about how the fantastic can help in moments of terrible pain.

"The City of Dead Works"

(I've had this story in my archives since March 11, 2002 - - the six-month anniversary of the event that inspired it. I'm reposting it today, on the second anniversary of 11 September 2001, because I have new readers who certainly have not seen it before; maybe they've noticed the title, listed in the "Notable Dispatches" section of my sidebar, but never clicked through, not realizing what that story was. This remains my only attempt to address the horrors of that day through my own art, fiction. I don't recall exactly how long it was after 11 September that I wrote this, but it was soon enough that I wrote it thinking that six thousand had died that day. The story was submitted to a single market and was rejected; I never sent it out again.)

There is never any rest for me, the Ferryman of the Dead.

I pole my barge across the black waters and up to the pier. So many wait this time, many more than usual. I wonder what has happened, what event has sent me this many. "Come aboard," I say. "I will take your coin for passage." One by one they file past me, each handing to me the coin that they never knew they had. It is the coin which determines where they shall be taken to rest, its metal shaped and determined by life. The coins of these dead are gold, every one of them purest gold. Six thousand come aboard my barge, and each has passage for the farthest and greatest of destinations. In that moment I know that something truly dark has happened; the gold coins are always forged in moments of darkness. I am the Ferryman. I can give them no answers to what lies behind their haunted, questioning eyes. I can only take them on this, the last of all journeys.

When they are all aboard I take up the pole and push away from the pier. The barge always feels the same, no matter how many stand upon its decks. Whether six or six thousand, it is all the same to me. I guide us out onto the River Styx. Some of the people look worried, but there is no need for fear. This river can do them no harm. They are already dead.

This is to be a long journey, I know – it always is, to this destination. As I guide the barge through the black waters, I look on the faces of those who have come to me. As different as these people all look, they all have the same expressions of shock, disbelief, and withering sadness. Here is a man of business, talking into a cell phone. He is trying to call someone, anyone, who will tell him that it’s all a dream, that it didn’t happen, that he didn’t die in a blast of fire, smoke, glass and steel. There is a mother who is explaining to her daughter that they won’t be going to Disneyland after all. And there, a group of firemen stand together, realizing that soon they will meet all their brothers-in-arms who have gone into the infernos before them. So many now – colleagues once in business and now colleagues in death, people who have never before met but now have the gravest thing in common. As the current takes hold, I look back at the pier. There are more gathering there. There are always more. They will wait. Time does not exist for the dead.

"Please," a young man says as he turns to me, "I have to go home to my daughters."

"You are going home now," I reply. "To the home where all eventually return." Two black rocks slide past on either side, the rocks that mark the passage of the circling Styx.

"This can’t be," a woman cries out. "My mother needs me."

"She will be with you soon enough."

"When?" Her voice pleads, and yet there is no solace that is mine to give.

"I cannot say," I reply. "The Ferryman has no hand in Fate."

The tears come then, tears from the six thousand that run over the gunwales and into the river which has been fed by tears for centuries. All tears are born in the River Styx.

"Where will you take us?" someone asks.

"To the place you are promised," I answer. I recall the words of a poet: Will there be beds for all who seek? Yea, beds for all who come.

One our left we approach the Hills of the Damned, an endless stretch of shattered lands which reach away into the blackness. The waters echo with the cries of all those who have been taken to the Hills for the agony they have brought on the living. I consider the bag of six thousand gold coins, and I realize that I will have to journey to the Hills this day. There will be a person, perhaps more, who will pay me with a coin of black tin; but not on this journey. As the hills recede behind us, the unending cries of the damned become fainter and fainter until they are drowned out by the lapping of the waters upon the sides of the boat and the marker stones that we pass. The six thousand fall silent, each realizing that it is not a dream. I would offer solace, but as ever I cannot. I am the Ferryman.

We come around a particularly dark bend, and before us lies a very wide expanse of water, as if the Styx has become an ocean – which in some sense it probably has. And beyond that expanse are the thousands of twinkling lights that I have come to know so well. One man, a fireman, sees them too. "What is that?" he asks.

"It is the City of Dead Works," I reply. The lights of the city glow on the horizon, and every one of the six thousand turns toward them as the Styx impels us onward. As we come ever closer to the city, the glittering lights reflect off the black water.

"I don’t understand," someone else says. "The City of Dead Works?"

"Aye," I reply. "Behold!"

From behind us, golden light: the Sun of the Dead is rising as it always does when the dead come near the City. Above us the firmament is turning purple, then blue; soon the light of the Sun will illuminate the City of Dead Works. As the sky lightens, the true scope of that city becomes plain: it stretches away into the land, farther than any eye could see. Not even the highest-soaring raven, cavorting in the breezes and zephyrs of the dead, could take it all in. It is bigger by far than any one city ever built by the hand of men, because it encompasses some part of all of them. Perhaps it is bigger than all of the cities ever built. Now the sun’s first rays come up behind us, and the first buildings can be seen down by the water.

"That one looks Egyptian," a woman says.

"The Great Library of Alexandria," I tell her. "Once the greatest repository of learning the world had ever seen, now only a memory to the living and a reality only to the dead."

A man points to a building high upon a rock. I nod.

"The Temple of Solomon," I say.

"There are ships in the harbor," says another. Thus for him I name the ships: Arizona, Indianapolis, Lusitania, Bismarck, Wilhelm Gustloff, Cap Arcona. And many, many others. I scan over the impossibly vast city and spot Dresden, as it was; and beside it the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. And how many smaller villages, tucked into the hills beyond the City? None can say. The Sun of the Dead shines upon those hills now, and the great stone statues in the likeness of Siddhartha Gautama.

"I don’t understand," a young man says. "Why this City? Why here?"

I only shake my head as we continue to float by the City. I do not point out the fairly small, nondescript office building that sits near the water. It is not a particularly remarkable building; nor was it, really, until the fuse was lit. The six thousand almost don’t recognize it.

Almost.

Not one word is uttered as we slide past the Alfred Murrah Federal Building. Then we turn away from the City of Dead Works, and head again down the waters of the Styx toward distant hills and the place where these people will join their brethren.

"Who lives in that city?" It is a priest in a fireman’s coat.

"No one lives there," I tell him. "The City of Dead Works is not for people. It is for the buildings and the ships. It is for the books and the music, the sculptures and the paintings which are gone forever. It is for everything destroyed by craven people in the name of foolish wars, for everything judged forfeit in the face of transitory desires."

The Styx takes us into the Golden Hills. Soon we will be there, and the six thousand will go where they belong. And then the Styx will complete its circle, taking me back to the pier where more dead await.

"We will be there soon," I say. "Soon we will be at the Elysian Fields, where all heroes go – for that is what you all are. It is what you have bought with your lives, with the shaping of your coins into gold." No one replies. We near the last bend now, and before us lie the Elysian Fields, where peace reigns and where heroes dwell; where all is light and voices are always raised in song. The Sun of the Dead shines warmly on Elysium.

But they do not see it. They, the six thousand, all gaze back behind us upon the City of Dead Works. It will soon be behind us forever as we round the last bend of the River Styx into Elysium. I know they all need one last look upon that City, and I do not grudge them that. For myself, I do not look back; the eyes of the Ferryman are ever forward. But I know. I know that the City of Dead Works is different now. I know that it has changed. I know that the people who come with me now to Elysium, the dead around me, look back on the two soaring towers of steel that now rise above the City where there had been no towers before.

I know these things.

I am the Ferryman of the Dead.

Fading Into Memory

The first major historical event of my lifetime was probably the resignation of President Nixon. I was just shy of three years old when that happened, and I have utterly no memory of it. In fact, I have no memory of President Ford, either. The first historical figure of whom I have any distinct memory is President Carter. Thus, the first five years of history through which I lived does not exist for me as memory. They're just pages in the history books, no less so because I lived through them than they are for my daughter who did not.

And for her, 9-11-01 will be the same way. I'll be able to describe to her the incredible sadness of that day; I'll be able to tell her where I was when I heard the news begin to unfold; I'll be able to relate how the news got worse and worse and worse. I'll be able to tell her how, for three days afterward, the skies were clear and unbroken by jet-plane contrails as air traffic was halted. I'll be able to tell her about Buffalo firemen standing in every intersection, taking donations for their brethren in NYC. All that and more, I'll be able to tell her. But it will never be as real for her as it was and is for me. For her, it will be like the Kennedy assassination or Nixon resignation are for me, and how Pearl Harbor was for my parents (Dad was two, Mom was four months).

We tell ourselves that we must never forget, that we must keep the pain real, that we must never allow those terrible moments to recede into history like everything else. But we fool ourselves if we think we can. September 11, 2001 is already receding into history, faster than we realize. And I believe that this is as it should be.

There have been so many horrible days in our nation's history, days when the darkness seemed ready to overwhelm us and threaten the very fabric of our nation. Each time, America has moved on, incorporating the bad days into the tapestry of its history. There will come a time when September 11, 2001 will be just another seminal event in history, more known than remembered. And it won't be a hundred years from now. It's already starting.

I've seen some complaints, online and off, that we aren't doing enough to mark the occasion. Perhaps it's unseemly to many that NBC should air reruns of its Thursday night lineup on such a momentous day, and in truth, it does seem odd to me that not a single prime-time special is devoted to the 9-11-01 anniversary, even though I don't believe that all three networks should devote their entire schedules to it. If this year's observance is less-than-satisfying, I'm still one who found last year's "All 9-11, all the time" approach, even in the days preceding the actual date, to be simply too much. I suppose that I no longer wish to partake in public mourning; and it does not strike me as particularly healthy to try each year to recapture or regenerate the anger and shock and desperation of that day.

For myself, I plan to do much as I did last year. I'll read some American poetry, listen to some American music, and perhaps watch an American movie or an American television show. It just seems right to me to take a bit of time to reflect on American cultural artifacts tomorrow, since it was not just America but American culture that was attacked two years ago. That is how I choose to remember and honor those who died: by reminding myself that America is still here, that our contributions to the world and our species are real, and that they will last far, far longer than Osama Bin Laden's hatred ever possibly can - - even if he crashes a thousand planes into our thousand tallest buildings.

There is more sanctity - - true sanctity, that which celebrates beauty in the face of a harsh world and an unforgiving universe - - in a Gene Kelly dance number, in a Frank Lloyd Wright building, in a Lerner-and-Loewe song, in the taste of a grilled hot dog, in the crack of a baseball bat, in the spiral of a perfectly-thrown football, and in a Robert Heinlein short story than there are in the hearts of a million terrorists who are prepared to immolate themselves and a thousand innocents in the name of a hating God.

Wednesday, September 10, 2003

Cool, but does it make a nice cup of coffee?

I've obviously been noodling around a bit with the new Blogger features, mainly concentrating on titles. Now I can title my posts, just like all the Cool Kids with their Movable Type blogs. Of course, figuring out how to get them to show up was a bit of a pain, as the "New Features" page didn't exactly point the way to any directions, so I had to do some searching before I finally found the necessary Blogger tags to make the titles actually show on the blog itself. I also tried them with a number of different styles and font-sizes, and I've settled (for now) on the current appearance.

I'm also interested in the "Change Time and Date" feature, so if I have a post that I want to appear on a certain date I can do that, I think. But the explanation here is very spotty. If I do this -- say, if I write a post on November 6 but change its date to November 9, will it automatically appear on November 9 when someone loads the page, or will publishing be required on the 9th to make the thing appear? This is a feature I'd like to use, but there's no explanation anywhere that I can find as to just how it works. If anyone can answer this, let me know.

Once again, I see no compelling reason to make the switch over to Movable Type yet. Blogger has its hiccups of functionality, but as I see it, they really are working to make things better. I suspect I'll keep using Blogger until it significantly falls off in quality. I would, though, like to move eventually to a non-Blogspot server with my own registered domain name, but that's a way off.

Anyway, some of this new stuff looks pretty cool, and some of it I doubt I'll use. That's usually the way it goes, though.

WARNING: Political Anger Ahead.

During the rush to war, it was my greatest fear that we'd muck up the aftermath by executing the rebuilding of Iraq in half-assed fashion. I've tried to not be discouraged by what appears, every day, to be a giant lack of planning on the part of people who seem to have genuinely expected a warm and wonderful welcome once Saddam was killed driven into hiding. I've tried consoling myself with the "It takes a while to rebuild a county, so give us time" meme. I've tried giving the President and his Administration, if not exactly the benefit of the doubt, at least a granting of the possibility that they might do it right in the end.

Well, not anymore.

Not when the Administration has to admit that its funding request for Iraqi reconstruction is $55 billion short, just one day after the President made his request for $87 billion on national television. Not when Donald Rumsfeld, Mr. "Our critics are the ones making danger", is saying things like ""I don't believe it's our job to reconstruct the country." Not when he's claiming that what's needed is not more, but fewer, troops. Not when, in not one but two wars now, "Blow it up and then get the hell out of Dodge" seems to be the Admistration's general approach.

These aren't the grownups, and they're not in charge. They're children, and they're behaving like a bunch of kids with unlimited access to someone else's toys.

Whoa....new Blogger features....desk is spinning....head nearing exploding....oh, it's all fine now. Whew! (Seriously, this stuff looks pretty cool.)

Remember that episode of The Brady Bunch when Mike and the boys build a special clubhouse in the backyard for the girls? Mike instructs Bobby to go get some nails, which he does. Later on, when the girls' clubhouse is done, suddenly the boys' clubhouse collapses in a heap of lumber. Greg turns to Bobby and says, "When Dad told you to go find some nails, where did you get them?" And Bobby replies, "I took them out of there," pointing to the now-collapsed boys' clubhouse.

Well, apparently Bobby Brady now works for NASA. Check out the pictures. I especially like the two dudes standing nearby in the universal "Crap, I hope that's not my fault" pose.

(Via Teresa Nielsen Hayden, who is on a tear right now. If you're not reading her blog, you're missing out. And on The Brady Bunch, whatever happened to the clubhouses, anyway? You never see them again. Did Mike get pissed and tear them down on the spot?)

[TINFOIL]

The martini-swirling Mr. Harris sums up the airport-security screening thing that will, if enacted as-is, simply refuse to allow up to four million people access to air travel, whether they are in any position to actually threaten a plane or not. And a lot of folks see this as an unacceptable policy that is reminiscent of a police state.

But, it occurs to me that this might be a nefarious scheme to save AMTRAK!!!

Just think: those people denied permission to fly have to travel some way, right? This will increase Amtrak's customer base in one fell swoop! What a masterstroke!

[/TINFOIL]

Dominion has a post regarding school prayer that I found pretty funny. I love it when I don't see the punchline coming.

(I think that Dominion and Josh Marshall should have a "narrow blog" contest!)

I don't know how big of a ripple-effect this will have on publishing, but the e-book has suffered what looks to me like a pretty big setback: Barnes&Noble has stopped selling them.

My view, based on not a lot outside of sheer guesswork, is that e-books won't really become viable until handheld technology is a lot more widespread than it is now. It'll get there, I think, but for now, e-books have been a product without a real market.

I’m starting to wonder if Gregg Easterbrook has lost his grip on reality, or if his habit of reusing clever puns and verbal constructions until they are no longer clever is now melding with a bizarre tendency to fixate on things that just aren't true. This has cropped up in his obsession with Senator Hillary Clinton's byline on books, and now it's cropping up again with respect to the Buffalo Bills' uniforms. I don't mind that he thinks they're ugly. While I like the home uniform, I don't care for the road version much. But Easterbrook keeps on insisting that the Bills have done away with red, white and blue. Funny, because the Bills' official team website says this about the new uniforms:

The traditional red, white and blue color scheme that has been part of the Bills look since 1962 remains but has been intensified with the addition of a darker blue. The team's red helmet with a blue charging buffalo on the side has also been maintained but has been modified to include nickel gray and navy stripes. In another nod to tradition, the nickel gray of the 1960-61 Bills returns as a subtle enhancement on the helmet as well as the jersey and pants.

Maybe Easterbrook is of the belief that "red, white and blue" only includes one specific shade of blue, but that seems like hair-splitting to me. They darkened the blue, but it's still noticeably blue. Their pants are still white. Red is still evident in their helmets, stripes on the pants, and the side-panel of the jerseys. I'm not sure which color Easterbrook is referring when he talks about "Rusting Russian Dreadnought color" or whatever; is that the gray that's only used as trim?

Time was when I really looked forward to Easterbrook's columns, but the guy is sinking, fast. Maybe a Russian dreadnought can pluck him from the sea before he drowns.

(And when he mentions red, white and blue as the "most successful color scheme in history", I wonder if he's including Britain and France.)

Kevin Drum also comments today on Easterbrook's tendency to ignore the obvious in favor of whatever point Easterbrook wishes to pound into the ground, this time in a case where Easterbrook sees "anti-Christian bias" in the news media that is actually much better explained from the simple standpoint of the ratings-game. That's an important point that gets lost a lot of the time: when "What is Christian" and "What sells" happen to not be the same thing (by whichever measure of "What is Christian"), it seems a bit disingenuous to conclude bias when the media or the market gravitates toward "What sells". This seems something that Gregg Easterbrook should know.

And finally, as long as I'm flogging Easterbrook, I might as well point out this whopper of a quote, when he compares Dennis Miller's stint on Monday Night Football to Rush Limbaugh's current appearances on NFL Countdown: "Note that their respective politics roughly cancel each other out, leaving a net of Pat Summerall." It certainly seems that Easterbrook hasn't been paying much attention to Miller lately…

These days, it seems like nary a day passes without some me finding some reminder of the old joke about how when my ship comes in, I'll be standing at the train station. I'm trying to get my writing career going, with spectacularly little success - - and here's this Jim Caple guy, first being paid by ESPN to visit fifteen major-league ballparks and write about them (another ESPN writer did the other fifteen), and now he's being paid by ESPN to travel the length of the mighty Mississippi looking for offbeat sports-stories from the heartland and our greatest river.

I'm just not living right.

(Oh, and the lucky SOB actually got to run in the Milwaukee Brewers sausage race! Ach, I hate him so much....)

SDB has a couple of interesting posts today.

First, he discusses the enormous obstacle to Middle East peace that is Yasser Arafat. This is what makes the whole Middle East peace thing so frustrating: in a perfect world, it would be pretty obvious that getting Arafat off the world stage - - most likely by killing him - - would help things, but I'm just not convinced that the void created by Arafat's departure would be filled with anything better. But then, leaving him in place certainly isn't working out, either. I don't think there can really be peace as long as Arafat is alive, but I don't think the chances for peace significantly improve with him dead, either. Ugh. Talk about your quagmires: the Middle East has been one for how many thousand years now?

Second, SDB points to a news item in which some unnamed Saudi official claims that Osama Bin Laden specifically recruited a majority of Saudis for the 9-11-01 operation in order to make Saudi Arabia look bad. Now, I don't read this person's comments quite the same way SDB does - - SDB seems to think the Saudi source is claiming that the whole purpose of 9-11, from Bin Laden's perspective, was to discredit Saudi Arabia by virtue of fifteen of the highjackers being Saudis. It seems to me that what's being claimed here is not quite that, but rather that Bin Laden, having decided to execute a major operation against the US and on American soil, chose to do so in such a way that an additional benefit would be to discredit Saudi Arabia.

According to the ABCNews story, US terrorism experts pretty much reject the Saudi official's theory, anyway. They think that the explanation for Bin Laden's recruitment of mainly Saudis for 9-11 is more prosaic: there simply are more Saudis to recruit for terrorist activities, and they're easier to get in place for their strikes (or at least they were, back then). I suppose it doesn't occur to the quoted Saudi official that maybe his country is already discredited, in that it's apparently easy to recruit Saudis to be terrorists in the first place.

("My heart bleeds peanut butter"? That metaphor's just weird! Between that and his "vanishing pants" thing of a few weeks ago, I'm starting to form some really odd mental images of Mr. Den Beste…)

It's a nifty month for planetary astronomy! We had Mars at its closest point to Earth in quite some time (my entry for "understatement of the year"), and now Saturn is at its best angle for viewing the rings in years.



Here we have Saturn viewed first in the ultraviolet spectrum, then in visible light, and finally in the infrared. Wow. I don't care how much money it costs. I hope they either figure out a way to keep Hubble operating, or replace it with something even better.

(Link via Aaron, the motorcycling would-be astronomer/blues musician.)

Tuesday, September 09, 2003

Apparently YACCS Comments have returned from the dead. And there was much rejoicing. I won't bother keeping that other message-board thingie up, although I may resurrect it if YACCS goes down again for an extended time. We shall see.

Time for another entry in my ongoing series, How Can You Look At Britney Without Laughing When There Are Women Such As This In The World?

Julie Delpy.



BTW, according to this site, which provides corroborating links, this fall Delpy will be rejoining director Richard Linklater and costar Ethan Hawke in filming a sequel to the wonderful and bittersweet romance Before Sunrise.
I recall reading somewhere that the sense of smell is the most strongly "emotional" of the five senses. Maybe that's the wrong way of putting it, but it certainly seems that smell can bring up the most vivid memories and associations, at least sometimes. I'm sure we've all had the experience of smelling something, in our adult lives, that transports us back to some specific time and place from childhood - - not a hazy remembrance, but a memory that is sharp and real. It can be Mom's cooking, for example, and the changes in our palates between childhood and adulthood probably account for that feeling that we can never quite make it as good as she did, though if we're good, we can come pretty darn close.

It can be other things as well. There used to be a "New Age" bookstore in Buffalo, called "East and West Books", that I liked to frequent when I was home from college, because I was a philosophy major and this particular bookstore had a pretty good selection of philosophy and science texts beyond the Eastern mysticism that one might expect from such a venue. This store always burned a certain type of incense, in one aroma only, and they burned so much of it that books that had sat on their shelves for a long enough time eventually took on that same scent. I can still detect hints of that smell on books that I bought at that store today, even years after the store has gone. That smell, though, always brings back the vivid memories I have of that place, and I can even remember the almost-exact floorplan and location of the various categories within the stacks.

Intimately connected with memory is ritual, and scent can play a large role in ritual. This is why many religious services involve the burning of incense. But it's not just actual ceremonial ritual that can be enhanced through scent. Our lives consist largely of rituals that are unremarked and unrecognized; sometimes those rituals disappear by virtue of necessity. But the proper alignment of scent can bring them back with startling clarity. This happened to me the other night.

My wife and I used to both work in the restaurant business, which among other things meant putting in long hours on Saturdays. Mostly, we worked the day shifts at our respective businesses, but when we finally got off work, it was typically quite late in the day for dinnertime - - sometimes it was after 8:00 in the evening - - and neither of us had any desire at all to cook something. Thus, our Saturday night meal, for almost four years, was Chinese takeout. Often I would go to pick it up, listening to Thistle and Shamrock on NPR in the car as I did so (that's NPR's Celtic music show). It was about a fifteen-minute drive from our favorite Chinese place back home, and thus the car would fill with the smell of Chinese food while I drove home to the strains of some Celtic reel or ballad. The final part of the ritual would be our sitting on the floor, in front of the TV with Chinese containers spread out on the carpet, eating our fill while watching The Pretender on NBC.

This period of our lives spanned the time of our engagement and the earliest handful of years of our marriage. It ended when certain changes occurred: I left the restaurant business, my wife took on a work schedule that often involved working a closing shift on Saturdays, NBC canceled The Pretender to make room on its schedule for the XFL (to this day the single act of network television that has angered me the most). We didn't decide to stop having Chinese every Saturday night; various things in our lives simply steered us in other directions, and we didn't even miss it, much. We still have Chinese every so often (not as much as we'd like, but money's tight right now), and when we do, we still sit on the floor to eat it. But the emotional fabric of those Saturday dinners, when we flopped down exhausted to watch a favorite weekly show, has been missing, and we didn't even realize it. Or I didn't…until we decided to have Chinese just this past Saturday night, and once again I drove home with the scents filling the car while my car speakers pulsated with the sounds of Uillean pipes and bodhran drums and whistles and voices raised in Gaelic lyrics.

Those smells sent me back in time. It was one of the spookiest sensations I've ever had - - nostalgia for something that, until that moment, I'd never realized I really missed.